MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W854982444

The 15th Biennial National Conference on Planning History: SACRPH, Toronto, 3-6 October 2013

2014· article· en· W854982444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zack Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueTown Planning Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFifteenthReputationEclecticismSubject (documents)SociologyWorld War IITheme (computing)Urban planningHistoryMedia studiesLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLawSocial scienceClassicsEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Last autumn, the Society for American City and Regional Planning History (SACRPH) held its fifteenth biennial meeting in Toronto, Canada. The meeting confirmed the association's reputation for vibrancy, eclecticism, and interdisciplinarity, bringing together some 320 urban, planning, and architectural historians; geographers; polit- ical scientists; sociologists; planning practitioners; and others. Programme committee co-chairs Nancy Kwak and Kristin Larsen wove together an extraordinarily coherent tapestry of 70 concurrent sessions, while the local arrangements committee led by Robert Lewis effectively mobilised local resources, held a reception at the Carlu - a beautifully restored Art Moderne concert hall - organised a provocative plenary session and put together the customary pre- and post-conference tours led by local subject experts.Sessions and papers: eclectic variationThe sessions and papers were as always eclectic. Perhaps acknowledging this, SACRPH does not assign an overarching theme to its conferences or group sessions into rigidly managed tracks. As at previous meetings the temporal and spatial focus was largely on the postwar period and on the United States, although several standout papers and sessions treated topics as diverse as the global influence of British planning ideas from the eighteenth century onwards, turn-of-the-twentieth-century planning movements and projects in a variety of locales, and the impact of the Cold War on urban development and urban life in Manila, Cherbourg, Berlin, and Baltimore. Reflecting the intensive interest of scholars in particular places, people, and ideas, two-part sessions were given over to the postwar planning of Pittsburgh, the legacy of Raymond Unwin, and social change and physical urban spaces.Transportation, infrastructure (broadly defined), and housing were major leitmo- tifs. Several papers approached the historical planning of airports and the impacts of highway and streetcar networks on the development of cities. A session on 'infra- structure as utopian planning' provocatively explored the impact of electrification and desalinisation in a variety of contexts, while another delved into the 'aesthetic infra- structure' of suburban cultural landscapes. A third session focused on the relationship between infrastructure and urban order, from the historical impact of street lighting on policing to the ideologies embedded in public works architecture. The dominant thread, however, was housing, housing policy and real estate development. This is perhaps unsurprising given the dominance and increasing corporate consolidation of private housing production, the often tragic history of state-orchestrated slum clear- ance and urban 'renewal,' especially in the United States, and the more recent trans- formation of inner cities by gentrification - all factors that have profoundly altered the physical form of North American cities and regions.The focus on housing was given full expression by outgoing SACRPH president Lawrence Vale (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), who delivered a luncheon address on 'Design-Politics in Planning History'. Journeying from the eighteenth-century settlement of Savannah, Georgia, to Lutyens' Delhi, to public housing in Atlanta and his hometown of Chicago, Vale reminded attendees that planning and design decisions always have distributional effects, and therefore analysis cannot and should not avoid attention to politics.It should not go unmentioned that large numbers of graduate students presented papers and posters, some with the generous support of the Society for their travel expenses. Sessions on research and publishing strategies of special relevance to junior scholars were well attended, as was a student reception. SACRPH has long prioritised the nurturing of emerging scholars and this conference was no exception.The conference setting as a themeFor the first time since its founding, the association met beyond the borders of the United States. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2950.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTown Planning ReviewSame topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207