MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W86299341 · doi:10.1137/9780898719987

A First Course in Numerical Methods

2011· book· en· W86299341 on OpenAlexaff
Uri M. Ascher, Chen Greif

Bibliographic record

VenueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicIterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourse (navigation)Computer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A First Course in Numerical Methods is designed for students and researchers who seek practical knowledge of modern techniques in scientific computing. Avoiding encyclopedic and heavily theoretical exposition, the book provides an in-depth treatment of fundamental issues and methods, the reasons behind the success and failure of numerical software, and fresh and easy-to-follow approaches and techniques. The authors focus on current methods, issues and software while providing a comprehensive theoretical foundation, enabling those who need to apply the techniques to successfully design solutions to nonstandard problems. The book also illustrates algorithms using the programming environment of MATLAB(r), with the expectation that the reader will gradually become proficient in it while learning the material covered in the book. A variety of exercises are provided within each chapter along with review questions aimed at self-testing. The book takes an algorithmic approach, focusing on techniques that have a high level of applicability to engineering, computer science, and industrial mathematics. Audience: A First Course in Numerical Methods is aimed at undergraduate and beginning graduate students. It may also be appropriate for researchers whose main area of expertise is not scientific computing and who are interested in learning the basic concepts of the field. Contents: Chapter One: Numerical Algorithms; Chapter Two: Roundoff Errors; Chapter Three: Nonlinear Equations in One Variable; Chapter Four: Linear Algebra Background; Chapter Five: Linear Systems: Direct Methods; Chapter Six: Linear Least Squares Problems; Chapter Seven: Linear Systems: Iterative Methods; Chapter Eight: Eigenvalues and Singular Values; Chapter Nine: Nonlinear Systems and Optimization; Chapter Ten: Polynomial Interpolation; Chapter Eleven: Piecewise Polynomial Interpolation; Chapter Twelve: Best Approximation; Chapter Thirteen: Fourier Transform; Chapter Fourteen: Numerical Differentiation; Chapter Fifteen: Numerical Integration; Chapter Sixteen: Differential Equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.104

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.247
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooksSame topicIterative Methods for Nonlinear EquationsFrench-language works237,207