MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W86723469 · doi:10.22260/isarc2014/0034

Wood-Frame Wall Panel Sequencing Based on Discrete-Event Simulation and Particle Swarm Optimization

2014· article· en· W86723469 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... ISARC · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationFrame (networking)Event (particle physics)Process (computing)DoorsComputer scienceTask (project management)AlgorithmEngineeringDiscrete event simulationSequence (biology)Real-time computingSimulationMechanical engineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wood-Frame Wall Panel Sequencing Based on Discrete-Event Simulation and Particle Swarm Optimization Mohammed Sadiq Altaf, Mohamed Al-Hussein, Haitao Yu Pages 254-261 (2014 Proceedings of the 31st ISARC, Sydney, Australia, ISBN 978-0-646-59711-9, ISSN 2413-5844) Abstract: In recent years off-site construction has become popular in North America due to the superior quality of the product, improved productivity, and reduced environmental impact. The panelized construction approach is one of the most readily utilized off-site construction methods. In a wood-frame panelized construction plant, wall panels are customized according to various design parameters such as length; height; number of studs, windows, and doors; panel type; and number of walls. These design parameters affect the processing time at each station in the plant, while the panel sequence affects the waiting time between stations. Due to this dynamic nature of the fabrication process, it is challenging to automatically generate an optimal panel sequence, as a result this task is performed manually in current practice. This paper focuses on integrating discrete-event simulation (DES) with an optimization algorithm in order to automate the panel sequencing process. Processing time at each station is calculated based on a task time formula which is a function of the design parameters of the panel, while delay is calculated based on a distribution derived from historical data. A particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is integrated with the simulation model using a central database in order to generate an optimal panel sequence. The proposed method will eliminate the manual work required for panel sequencing, and is expected to reduce production time up to 10%. The proposed method is implemented in a wood-frame panelized construction plant as a case study. Keywords: Panelized construction, Discrete-event simulation, Particle swarm optimization, Panel sequencing DOI: https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2014/0034 Download fulltext Download BibTex Download Endnote (RIS) TeX Import to Mendeley

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it