MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W91472121 · doi:10.1353/tmr.2010.0033

Overlapping solidarities: The politics of ethnicity and sufi turuq in Mauritania

2010· article· en· W91472121 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œMaghreb review/Maghreb review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Geopolitics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsEthnic groupIslamNexus (standard)Gender studiesPolitical scienceSociologyLawTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Maghreb Review, Vol. 35, 1-2, 2010 © The Maghreb Review 2010 This publication is printed on longlife paper OVERLAPPING SOLIDARITIES: THE POLITICS OF ETHNICITY AND SUFI TURUQ IN MAURITANIA BY CÉDRIC JOURDE∗ In contemporary Mauritania, ethnicity and Islam constitute two major political repertoires, among others of course, through which political battles are played out. Less often analysed, however, but no less important is the interplay between ethnicity and Islam in the political arena. This article seeks to contribute to a better understanding of this nexus of ethnicity, Islam and politics, by examining the participation of a Süfı tarıqa (plur. turuq, path or order) in political dynamics that were, and still are, practised and expressed through the idioms of ethnicity. More specifically, it will analyse primarily the role of the Tij�niyya Umariyya (related to the descendants and disciples of Al ˘�jj Umar Tall) in three different events that constituted, with others, the ethnic narrative of Mauritanian politics. These cases will help to demonstrate that Süfı turuq can act as major actors on the field of ethnic politics, being considered by many as legitimate political actors, as much as, if not more than, official political actors of the likes of elected deputies or government ministers. In most accounts of ethnic politics in Mauritania, scholars have rightfully discussed the roles of such political actors as the Forces de libération des Africains de Mauritanie (FLAM), El Hor, the informal but influential groups such as the Nasserists and Ba’athists, and of course the various governments themselves.1 Undoubtedly, these actors did play a critical role in the narrative of politicized ethnicity; much less known, however, is the role played by Süfı turuq. This article will examine three cases during which one of the turuq at present in Mauritania, the Tij�niyya Umariyya, has invested the terrain of politics and ethnicity: first, the events surrounding the participation of the Umariyya in the electoral politics of the 1940s–1950s, when ethnic discourses gained a leverage in Mauritanian politics; second, the 1988–91 period of state-led ethnic repression; and third, the zy�ra of the Tall family in the town of Boghé in 1994–5, in the context of the Mauritanian regime’s consolidating grip over the Fuuta Tooro. I treat them as three vignettes, not as three links of a causal or constitutive chain; though one could certainly examine this possibility. ∗ University of Ottawa Data for this article were collected through fieldwork research in Nouakchott, Boghé, Kaédi, in 1997, 1999–2000 and 2006, where I held informal and open discussions with informants; through archival research in the National Archives of Mauritania (coupled with archival research in France in 1999, 2000 and 2002); and by collecting Mauritanian newspapers and governmental reports. 1 See Marchesin 1992 for a general overview. OVERLAPPING SOLIDARITIES 223 The next section sets up the theoretical framework upon which this article is founded. It draws on a body of research that has been looking at cases across the Muslim world where the historical constitution of ethnic identities and the construction of Süfı turuq overlap, leading to what Verkaaik (2004a) calls the ‘ethnicization’ of Islam. The second section of this article will examine the three empirical cases upon which it builds its main argument. SÜFI TURUQ, POLITICS AND ETHNICITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE The complex relationship between Süfı orders, or turuq and state power in a number of contemporary Muslim countries has attracted a respectable degree of attention from social scientists. In Senegal, the country where the power of Sûfi leaders is perhaps the most visible, scholars agree that state representatives and Sûfi leaders have developed a deeply profound relationship. Of course, they have changed over time and space, and were (and are) multifarious, ranging from direct confrontation to cooptation, from reciprocal assimilation to polite but distant acknowledgement, from domination to resistance, as nicely demonstrated by such authors as Robinson (2000), Searing (2002), Cruise O’Brien (2003), Villalón (1995) or Beck (1996). For instance, in the postcolonial period Senegalese Süfi leaders have guaranteed electoral support to the incumbent president and ruling party in exchange for favourable policies or economic...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it