MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W968495960 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r236-22

Honduran Imhoff Tanks: Potentials and Pitfalls

2010· article· en· W968495960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Imhoff tank is a structure originally designed to provide primary wastewater treatment. It is a sedimentation tank with a steeply sloped floor resting above a sludge digester. During the 1930s, Imhoff tanks represented 50 % of all waste-water treatment facilities in the United States. The majority of Imhoff tanks within the U.S. have since been abandoned or modified to adapt to changing treatment objectives and regulations. However, within the Central American country of Honduras they continue to represent a significant portion of the wastewater treatment infrastructure and are routinely designed and constructed where populations are small and terrain is limited. In Honduras, stormwater inflow and infiltration into wastewater treatment systems pose significant challenges. The drainage flows in urban areas mix with raw sewage creating dilute, but large volumes of, wastewater that requires treatment. Imhoff tanks in Honduras use design parameters more suitable for dryer regions of the world that do not experience such consequences of storm-water. These tanks are therefore currently not successful in providing treatment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it