Honduran Imhoff Tanks: Potentials and Pitfalls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Imhoff tank is a structure originally designed to provide primary wastewater treatment. It is a sedimentation tank with a steeply sloped floor resting above a sludge digester. During the 1930s, Imhoff tanks represented 50 % of all waste-water treatment facilities in the United States. The majority of Imhoff tanks within the U.S. have since been abandoned or modified to adapt to changing treatment objectives and regulations. However, within the Central American country of Honduras they continue to represent a significant portion of the wastewater treatment infrastructure and are routinely designed and constructed where populations are small and terrain is limited. In Honduras, stormwater inflow and infiltration into wastewater treatment systems pose significant challenges. The drainage flows in urban areas mix with raw sewage creating dilute, but large volumes of, wastewater that requires treatment. Imhoff tanks in Honduras use design parameters more suitable for dryer regions of the world that do not experience such consequences of storm-water. These tanks are therefore currently not successful in providing treatment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".