MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W96860797

On K-broadcasting in graphs

2006· dissertation· en· W96860797 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Shao

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcasting (networking)Vertex (graph theory)GraphComputer scienceCombinatoricsNetwork topologyUpper and lower boundsConnectivityMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsComputer network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadcasting is a fundamental information dissemination problem, wherein a message is sent from one vertex, the originator, to all other vertices in a graph. In k -broadcasting, an informed vertex can sends the message to at most k uninformed neighbors in each time unit. This thesis presents several algorithms to perform efficient k -broadcasting. The algorithm KBT generates the optimal k -broadcast scheme in trees, while the algorithm KBC finds the k -broadcast center of a given tree. This thesis presents an efficient heuristic for k -broadcasting. The heuristic has a low time complexity and generates fast k -broadcast schemes in many network topologies. A k -broadcast graph G is a graph on n vertices where the k -broadcast time of G is [Special characters omitted.] log k +1 n [Special characters omitted.] . B k (n) stands for the minimum possible number of edges in a k -broadcast graph on n vertices. A k -broadcast graph on n vertices with B k (n) edges is a minimum k -broadcast graph, which is denoted by k -mbg. This thesis presents several new k -mbg's and an improved lower bound on B k (n)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207