MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W978144381 · doi:10.1155/2011/807123

Opioid Analgesics Suppress Male Gonadal Function, but Opioid Use in Men and Women Does Not Correlate with Symptoms of Sexual Dysfunction

2011· article· en· W978144381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePain Research and Management · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLuteinizing hormoneOpioidSexual dysfunctionTestosterone (patch)Internal medicineSexual functionHormoneProlactinDehydroepiandrosterone sulfateEndocrinologyFollicle-stimulating hormoneDehydroepiandrosteroneSex hormone-binding globulinFibromyalgiaAndrogenReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Opioid analgesia impairs gonadal function in men and women, but the correlation with symptoms and hormonal measurements of hypogonadism is not well established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of impaired gonadal function in men and women using opioids for chronic pain, and to determine the correlation of symptoms with hormonal measurements of gonadal function. METHODS: A prospective study of patients attending a multidisciplinary pain clinic was conducted. A total of 65 women (47 opioid users and 18 nonopioid analgesic controls) and 32 men (26 opioid users and six controls) were enrolled. Histories of sexual dysfunction and hormonal testing (men: total testosterone [TT], free testosterone [FT], prolactin and luteinizing hormone; women: FT, TT, prolactin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, sex hormone- binding globulin, progesterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle- stimulating hormone, and estradiol) were obtained. RESULTS: In men, a low FT level was more common in opioid users (20⁄26; P=0.04). In men with abnormal hormone levels, there was no difference in the frequency of sexual dysfunction compared with men with normal hormone levels, and no difference in the frequency of opioid versus nonopioid use. In women, opioid users had lower FT levels (P=0.02). Low dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate was more frequent in women on opioids (P=0.03) in the menopausal group only (P=0.046). Premenopausal women taking opioids more frequently had a low TT level (P=0.03). The frequency of female sexual dysfunction was the same in opioid users (32⁄47) and controls (13⁄18; P=0.75), and also did not relate to any hormone abnormality. DISCUSSION: Men taking opioids had lower FT and higher prolactin levels, and women taking opioids had lower FT levels. Frequency of sexual dysfunction did not correlate with hormone levels in either men or women taking opioids. CONCLUSION: Opioids frequently cause low FT levels in men, but there is no relationship between abnormal hormone levels and symptoms of sexual dysfunction. Therefore, all men should be screened for low FT levels. Women on opioids had lower FT levels, but this did not correlate with sexual dysfunction symptoms. Therefore, measurements of FT or other hormones were not considered to be useful in women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it