MOBILITY INTENTION AND SUBSEQUENT RELOCATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conceptualization and analysis of the relations between dwelling and neighborhood satisfaction, movement intention, and mobility presented in previous research suffer from two major deficiencies: (1) the role of other life events such as marriage, divorce, retirement, and loss of spouse are usually ignored; (2) important differences between different sociodemographic groups are obscured. In this paper a more general model of mobility including other life events is presented and the subgroup differences are explored in terms of the difficulties experienced by disadvantaged groups, particularly the elderly, in translating expectations into action. Two sets of longitudinal data are utilized, one from the Community Development Strategies Evaluation undertaken in nine U.S. cities and the other from the Quality of Life Surveys collected by the Institute of Behavioural Research at York University for a Canadian sample. Consistent results are obtained which show that not only do substantial numbers of respondents...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it