Made Lebah: Reminiscences from 'jaman setengah Bali'(Half Bali Times)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter focuses on perceptions of cultural place and social change in twentieth-century Bali through the eyes of one of its many extraordinary, "ordinary" people. Made Lebah was born in the in the Gianyar village of Peliatan in the early years of the century and died just before its end. His reminiscences begin in the time he referred to as "jaman setengah Bali", when the regency of Gianyar was only nominally controlled by the dutch, who had conquered the South Balinese kingdoms in 1906-8. This was the period of his childhood, his time as a servant in the royal court of Peliatan, and the beginnings of his life-long enchantment with Balinese music. He grew up under Dutch colonial rule, when he was given the first opportunity to travel the world as a performer in the Peliatan Gamelan troupe, which he had helped form. Thus began hist first encounters with many of the Western musicians, scholars and students who flocked to Bali after the Peliatan performances at the Paris Colonial Exhibition in 1931 brought this stunning musical style to world attention. Subsequently Lebah worked for Colin McPhee, the Canadian composer who devoted himself to the study and exposition of Balinese music. He had what might appear to be the unusual combination of jobs as music teacher and driver for McPhee. But in fact most performers in Bali of that era combined their artistic activities with more mundane pursuits as farmers or traders. And it remains the case today, that only a small number are able to support themselves as full-time professional performers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".