MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W989593260

Distinguishing profile deviations from a part's deformation using the maximum normed residual test

2012· article· en· W989593260 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualDistortion (music)Displacement (psychology)Identification (biology)SortingTask (project management)Deformation (meteorology)Computer scienceProcess (computing)AlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-rigid parts, in free-state, may have a considerable different shape than their nominal model due to dimensional and geometric variations of manufacturing process, gravity loads and residual stress induced distortion. Therefore, sorting profile deviation from a part's deformation by comparing the part's nominal shape to its scanned free-state shape is a challenging task. This task is a key step in the Iterative Displacement Inspection (IDI) algorithm used for the inspection of non-rigid parts without the use of costly specialized fixtures. This paper proposes the use of the statistical maximum normed residual test to improve the aforementioned identification task. Thirty two simulated manufactured parts are studied to show that the proposed method reduces the type I and II identification error of the IDI method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it