MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W99489343 · doi:10.2136/sssabookser8.c4

Chemistry of Potassium in Soils

2005· book-chapter· en· W99489343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America book series · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySoil waterKineticsPotassiumDiffusionEnvironmental chemistrySoil scienceGeologyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The availability of soil potassium (K) to plants is related to the nature of soil K reserves, the chemistry of the structural configurations and surface properties of soil components involved, and the dynamics and equilibria of K in soil environments. K selectivity of soil particles is affected by mineralogical and chemical factors. The kinetics and mechanisms of K release and exchange are fundamental to understanding the chemistry of soil K. The zero-order, first-order, Elovich, and parabolic diffusion equations have been used to describe K kinetics in clays and soils. Kinetics of reactions existing between solution, exchangeable, nonexchangeable, and mineral phases of K profoundly influence K chemistry of soil. The rate and direction of these reactions determines whether applied K will be leached into lower horizons, taken by plants, converted into unavailable forms, or released into available forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it