MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W99997347 · doi:10.33137/rr.v39i2.8865

Le voyage d'Italie et la formation des élite françaises

2003· article· en· W99997347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElitePoliticsPeriod (music)PeninsulaHistoryThe RepublicHumanitiesClassicsPolitical scienceEconomic historyArtLawTheologyArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the sixteenth century, at least until 1559, Italy was a centre for political, diplomatic, and cultural activity for the French elite, who undertook studies and training in the Peninsula. Lawyers and magistrates in the making eagerly enrolled in the universities of Pavia, Ferrara, and especially Padua, where some of them joined with other scholars in constituting the first Literary Republic. Gentlemen who were aiming at a military career or wished to succeed at the Court went to the Academies of Naples, Bologna or Padua, where they learned fencing and riding. During the age of Henri IV, attitudes towards this double education, scholarly and aristocratic, changed thoroughly, partly for economic reasons, but also because of a general anti-Italian polemic which opposed the model of Italian culture and social structure to a national model. The French did continue to visit Italy during the entire early modern period, but latterly they went to “see,” not to learn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it