MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,914 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,914 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 39

Labels cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadmodels split
Justification, margin values, and analysis populations for oncologic noninferiority and equivalence trials: a meta-epidemiological study
T. Kleber, Alexander D. Sherry, Andrew Arifin, Gabrielle S. Kupferman, Ramez Kouzy, Joseph Abi Jaoude +7 more
2024· article· en· JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
afffundvenueaboutgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Advancing Academic Cancer Clinical Trials Recruitment in Canada
Rebecca Xu, Diana Kato, Gregory R. Pond, Stephen Sundquist, James Schoales, Saher Lalani +1 more
2021· review· en· Current Oncology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_broadmodels agree
Adherence to RECORD reporting guidelines among observational studies using routinely collected health data published in general medical journals: a meta-epidemiologic study
Heather J. Zhao, Inna Ushcatz, Chantel Walwyn, Kevin Kim, Eric I. Benchimol, Sinéad Langan +1 more
2025· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationmodels split
What Happens When the Author Does Not Provide an Abstract
Joseph S. Fulda
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · bibliometrics+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Sibling Authors Propose Bipolar Disorder Of Publishing Biomedical Research: With MEDLINE Footprint Imploding And Retraction Footprint Fudging, Can Pursuit For PubMed® Footprint Challenge Humane Human Imprinting By Physician Scientists?
Divya Gupta, Deepak Gupta
2023· article· en· Indian Journal of Community Health· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
Critical appraisal and comparison of recommendations of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia in children and adolescents: a methodological survey
Maíra Ramos Alves, Cristiane de Cássia Bergamaschi, Sílvio Barberato-Filho, Daniela Oliveira de Melo, Rejane Coan Ferretti Mayer, Jardel Corrêa de Oliveira +4 more
2023· article· en· BMJ Open· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
Differentiating between mapping reviews and evidence gap maps
Hanan Khalil, Andrea C. Tricco
2023· letter· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Informing the Digital Archive with Altmetrics
Ashley L. Taylor, Lauren Collister
2019· article· en· Scholarly and Research Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+open_sciencegpt · metaresearch+open_sciencemodels split
Articles, software, data: An Open Science ethological study
Teresa Gomez-Diaz, Tomás Recio
2024· article· en· Maple Transactions· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Research Integrity and Research Fairness: Harmonious or in Conflict?
Krishma Labib
2025· article· en· Canadian Journal of Bioethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearch+open_sciencegpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
New Media for Science: Key Features of Platforms with Open Peer Review
Angelina Gorbunova, Ivan Zassoursky, N. D. Trishchenko
2021· article· en· Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About