MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Random Matrices and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

489 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
489 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 10

Labels cover 0 of 489 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 489 of 489 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Determinantal Processes and Independence
J. Hough, Manjunath Krishnapur, Yuval Peres, Bálint Virág
2006· article· en· Probability Surveys· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
514
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Free Probability and Random Matrices
James A. Mingo, Roland Speicher
2017· book· en· Fields Institute monographs· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
427
citations
affunlabeled
Generating random density matrices
Karol Życzkowski, K. A. Penson, Ion Nechita, Benoı̂t Collins
2011· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
187
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction to KPZ
Jeremy Quastel
2011· article· en· Current Developments in Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
163
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
A two sample test in high dimensional data
Muni S. Srivastava, Shota Katayama, Yutaka Kano
2012· article· en· Journal of Multivariate Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Limits of spiked random matrices I
Alex Bloemendal, Bálint Virág
2012· article· en· Probability Theory and Related Fields· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
111
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Monotone Hurwitz Numbers and the HCIZ Integral
I. P. Goulden, Mathieu Guay-Paquet, Jonathan Novak
2014· article· fr· Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Random sorting networks
Omer Angel, Alexander E. Holroyd, Dan Romik, Bálint Virág
2007· article· en· Advances in Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
81
citations
affunlabeled
Integrals, partitions, and cellular automata
Alexander E. Holroyd, Thomas M. Liggett, Dan Romik
2003· article· lv· Transactions of the American Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
72
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Bulk universality of sparse random matrices
Jiaoyang Huang, Benjamin Landon, Horng‐Tzer Yau
2015· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Continuum Statistics of the Airy2 Process
Ivan Corwin, Jeremy Quastel, Daniel Remenik
2012· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
affunlabeled
Wigner chaos and the fourth moment
Todd Kemp, Ivan Nourdin, Giovanni Peccati, Roland Speicher
2016· article· en· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
61
citations
afffundunlabeled
The directed landscape
Duncan Dauvergne, Janosch Ortmann, Bálint Virág
2022· preprint· en· Acta Mathematica· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
affunlabeled
Algorithmic thresholds for tensor PCA
Gérard Ben Arous, Reza Gheissari, Aukosh Jagannath
2020· article· en· Project Euclid (Cornell University)· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
affunlabeled
Non-crossing cumulants of type B
Philippe Biane, Frederick M. Goodman, Alexandru Nica
2003· article· en· Transactions of the American Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
56
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About