MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

615 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
615 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 13

Labels cover 8 of 615 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 615 of 615 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
How doctors practice evidence‐based medicine
Yun‐Chieh Lu, Ying‐Chun Li
2011· article· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Clinical research: up from ‘clinical epidemiology’
Olli S. Miettinen, Lucas M. Bachmann, Johann Steurer
2009· article· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned
Margot Lindsay
2008· article· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
The grey zones of birth and death
Sholom Glouberman
2011· article· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Improving providers' survival estimates and selection of prognosis‐ and guidelines‐appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic bone metastases: Development of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival Decision Support Platform
Sara R. Alcorn, Christen R. Elledge, Anna W. LaVigne, Lawrence Kleinberg, Thomas J. Smith, Adam S. Levin +5 more
2022· review· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Rationality in medicine
Olli S. Miettinen
2009· article· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Medical good luck and medical bad luck
G. V. Ramesh Prasad
2019· article· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About