MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Systematic Reviews
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

998 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20122025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
998 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 20

Labels cover 65 of 998 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 998 of 998 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Does type of funding affect reporting in network meta-analysis? A scoping review of network meta-analyses
Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Eric Wong, Carole Lunny, Juan Camilo Martinez Molina, Iván D. Flórez, Andrea C. Tricco +1 more
2023· review· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broad+bibliometrics+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broad+insufficient_payload
15
citations
affunlabeled
Quality of measurement properties of medication adherence instruments in cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Henrique Ceretta Oliveira, Daisuke Hayashi Neto, Samantha Dalbosco Lins Carvalho, Rita de Cássia Lopes de Barros, Mayza Luzia dos Santos Neves, Carla Renata Silva Andrechuk +3 more
2023· review· en· Systematic Reviews· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadmodels split
How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol
Susan Armijo‐Olivo, Jorge Fuentes, Todd Rogers, Lisa Hartling, Humam Saltaji, Greta G. Cummings
2013· article· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
15
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Ian J. Saldanha, Christopher H. Schmid, Joseph Lau, Kay Dickersin, Jesse A. Berlin, Jens Jap +11 more
2016· article· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broad+scholarly_communication+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Breastfeeding support provided by lactation consultants in high-income countries for improved breastfeeding rates, self-efficacy, and infant growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Curtis J. D’Hollander, Victoria McCredie, Elizabeth Uleryk, Charles Keown‐Stoneman, Catherine S. Birken, Deborah L. O’Connor +1 more
2023· review· en· Systematic Reviews· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaepi_narrow
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Jennifer Watt, Zahra Goodarzi, Andrea C. Tricco, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Sharon E. Straus
2017· review· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broad
14
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews
Joanne S. M. Kim, Michelle Pollock, David Kaunelis, Laura Weeks
2022· letter· en· Systematic Reviews· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About