MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145661515 · doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0079-2

Erratum to: Study protocol: differential effects of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes: individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis and health economic evaluation

2015· article· en· W2145661515 on OpenAlexaff
Anneloes E. Ruifrok, Ewelina Rogozińska, Mireille N. M. van Poppel, Girish Rayanagoudar, Sally Kerry, Christianne J.M. de Groot, SeonAe Yeo, Emma Molyneaux, Marı́a Perales, Annick Bogaerts, José Guilherme Cecatti, Fernanda Garanhani Surita, Jodie M Dodd, Julie A. Owens, Nermeen El-Beltagy, Roland Devlieger, Helena Teede, Cheryce L. Harrison, Lene A. H. Haakstad, Alexis Shub, Narges Motahari, Serena Tonstad, Riitta Luoto, Tarja I. Kinnunen, Kym J. Guelfi, Fabio Facchinetti, Elisabetta Petrella, Suzanne Phelan, Tânia Terezinha Scudeller, Hans Hauner, Kristina M. Renäult, Linda Reme Sagedal, Ingvild Vistad, Signe Nilssen Stafne, Siv Mørkved, Kjell Å. Salvesen, Christina Anne Vinter, Márcia Regina Vítolo, Arne Astrup, Nina Rica Wium Geiker, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Lucilla Poston, Tracy Roberts, Richard D Riley, Arri Coomarasamy, Khalid S. Khan, Ben W. Mol, Shakila Thangaratinam

Bibliographic record

VenueSystematic Reviews · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersTechnische Universität MünchenGentofte HospitalSt. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i TrondheimHvidovre HospitalLunds UniversitetNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetSyddansk UniversitetNorges IdrettshøgskoleOdense UniversitetshospitalUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaTampereen YliopistoCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionPregnancyMeta-analysisBody mass indexMEDLINEWeight gainRandomized controlled trialCochrane LibraryPediatricsObstetricsInternal medicineBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After publication of this work [1], we noted that we inadvertently failed to include the complete list of all coauthors and that sample sizes of some of the trials listed in Table two were incorrect.The full list of authors has now been added and includes the names of all authors within the i-WIP Collaborative Network.The Authors' contributions and competing interests section modified accordingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.066
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.392
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0660.392
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.016
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0120.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1490.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.400
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystematic ReviewsSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207