MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,013 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,013 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 21

Labels cover 14 of 1,013 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,013 of 1,013 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Students as co-producers
Shilan Dargahi, Jessica Horne, Susan Smith
2024· article· en· International Journal for Students as Partners· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Triadic partnerships: Evaluation of a group mentorship scheme
Anna M. Foss, Sophia Köhler, Sumedh Kulkarni, Natalina Sutton, Mary-Ann Schreiner, Nicolò Saverio Centemero +4 more
2022· article· en· International Journal for Students as Partners· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Rethinking the university: a case study
Alan R. Davis, Rajiv S. Jhangiani, Diane Purvey
2022· article· en· On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Navigating power dynamics in student-staff partnerships
E. Siva Reddy, Tefo Mosienyane, Daniela Gachago, Abigail Tshiamala, Shalom Abiodun, Christine Immenga +1 more
2025· article· en· International Journal for Students as Partners· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
A time-capsule for Students as Partners 2034
Faiza Jan Iftikhar, Glenda Cox, Peter Lau, Maria Ishkova, Jennifer Z. Sun, Cassandra Iannucci +33 more
2025· article· en· International Journal for Students as Partners· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
U Have Integrity
Sarah Elaine Eaton
2019· article· en· Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Students Helping Students
Manju Hawkins
2008· article· en· LEARNing Landscapes· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Writing on the Ground
Janna Klostermann
2017· article· en· Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About