MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

6,765 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
6,765 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 127 of 136

Labels cover 2 of 6,765 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 6,765 of 6,765 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
The power of heartbeats through the lens of ι Orionis
H. Pablo, Noel D. Richardson, Jim Fuller, A. F. J. Moffat, Photometry Tiger Team
2017· book-chapter· en· CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
How big can stars get?
2018· article· en· NPARC· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Giants
G. Michaud, G. Alecian, J. Richer
2015· book-chapter· en· Astronomy and astrophysics library· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Wolf-Rayet stars in Local Group starbursts
Laurent Drissen
2003· article· en· Symposium - International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Outer Stellar Populations in the LMC
Ingrid Meschin, Carme Gallart, A. Aparicio, R. Carrera, M. Monelli, P. B. Stetson
2008· book-chapter· en· Astrophysics and space science proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Action-Based Dynamical Modelling For The Milky Way Disk
Wilma H Trick, Hans‐Walter Rix, Jo Bovy
2016· dissertation· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About