MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417183214 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.01754

Full Stokes magnetometry of the active M dwarfs AU Mic and EV Lac with SPIRou

2025· preprint· en· W4417183214 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. -F. Donati, P. I. Cristofari, Baptiste Klein, B Finociety, C. Moutou

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeeman effectMagnetic fieldStarsRotation (mathematics)Stokes parametersMagnetometerCircular polarizationStellar rotation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report in this paper circularly and linearly polarized observations of the young active M dwarfs AU Mic and EV Lac with the near-infrared SPIRou spectropolarimeter at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, collected from August to October 2023 over a few rotation cycles of both stars. Applying Least-Squares Deconvolution (LSD) to our spectra, we detected Zeeman signatures in circular (Stokes V) and linear (Stokes QU) polarization, and Zeeman broadening in unpolarized (Stokes I) LSD profiles, all exhibiting clear rotational modulation. Using the stellar surface tomographic technique of Zeeman-Doppler imaging on our sets of observations, along with a simple parametric description of how the small-scale and large-scale fields relate to each other, we recovered the magnetic topologies of AU Mic and EV Lac successively from LSD Stokes V, Stokes IV and Stokes IVQU profiles, to investigate how the reconstructed maps evolve as we provide more information, and ultimately infer reliable magnetic maps of both stars. We find that AU Mic hosts a fairly simple and mostly poloidal large-scale field aligned with the rotation axis within about 10deg, whereas that of EV Lac is more complex, stronger and less axisymmetric. Both stars feature intense small-scale fields, of about 4 kG for AU Mic and 6 kG for EV Lac when averaged over the whole stellar surface. Stokes QU Zeeman signatures allow one to reconstruct stellar magnetic fields more reliably, and are especially useful for stars with more complex fields and low vsini's like EV Lac.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207