MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Operator Algebra Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,131 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,131 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 23

Labels cover 0 of 1,131 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,131 of 1,131 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
ABSOLUTENESS, TRUTH, AND QUOTIENTS
Ilijas Farah
2013· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes series, Institute For Mathematical Sciences· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nonself-adjoint $2$-graph algebras
Adam H. Fuller, Dilian Yang
2015· article· en· Transactions of the American Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Soft operators in C*-algebras
Hannes Thiel, Eduard Vilalta
2024· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
A dynamical core for topological directed graphs
Berndt Brenken
2010· article· en· URN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library)· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Two variations on the Drury–Averson space
Nicola Arcozzi, Richard Rochberg, Eric T. Sawyer
2010· book-chapter· en· CRM proceedings & lecture notes· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Non-homogeneous extensions of Cantor minimal systems
Robin J. Deeley, Ian F. Putnam, Karen R. Strung
2020· preprint· en· Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
On Tsirelson pairs of C*-algebras
Isaac Goldbring, Bradd Hart
2023· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
ℓp$\ell ^p$ metrics on cell complexes
Thomas Haettel, Nima Hoda, Harry Petyt
2024· article· en· Journal of the London Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About