Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rotation flow on the circle T gives a concrete representation of the irrational rotation algebra, which is an in finite dimensional simple quotient of the group C*-algebra of the discrete Heisenberg group H3 analogously certain 2- and 3-dimensional Anzai flows on T2 and T3are known to give concrete representations of the corresponding quotients of the group C*-algebras of the groups H4 and H5,5. Considered here is the (minimal, effective) 4-dimensional Anzai flow F = (ℤ, T4) generated by the homeomorphism (y, x, w, v) ↦ (λy, yx, xw, wv); a group H6,10 is determined by F the faithful in finite dimensional simple quotients of whose group C*-algebra C*-(H6,10 have concrete representations given by F. Furthermore, the rest of the infinite dimensional simple quotients of C*-(H6,10 are identified and displayed as C*-crossed products generated by minimal effective actions and also as matrix algebras over simple C*-algebras from groups of lower dimension; these lower dimensional groups are H3 and subgroups of H4 and H5,5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".