MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

675 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
675 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 14

Labels cover 0 of 675 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 675 of 675 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Three Essays on Commitment and Information Problems
Matthias Fahn
2011· article· en· Electronic Theses of LMU Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Information Sharing in Financial Markets
2024· dataset· en· Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Verifiability and Effective Persuasion
Noemie Cabau, Ming Li
2024· preprint· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
An Ordinal Solution to King Solomon's Dilemma
Joshua S. Gans, Richard Holden
2025· preprint· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Valuing influence
Hyun‐Soo Ahn, Christopher Ryan, Joline Uichanco, Mengzhenyu Zhang
2023· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
On linear quadratic potential games
Sara Hosseinirad, Giulio Salizzoni, Alireza Alian Porzani, Maryam Kamgarpour
2025· article· en· Automatica· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Stability Definitions: Hybrid Preference
Haiyan Xu, Keith W. Hipel, D. Marc Kilgour, Liping Fang
2018· book-chapter· en· Studies in systems, decision and control· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reputational Algorithm Aversion
Gregory Weitzner
2024· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum Extensive Form Games
Kazuki Ikeda
2022· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bayesian Persuasion without Commitment
Itai Arieli, Colin Stewart
2025· preprint· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Discerning Solution Concepts
Nail Kashaev, Bruno Salcedo
2019· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Noncooperative Games
Elena Parilina, Puduru Viswanadha Reddy, Georges Zaccour
2022· book-chapter· en· Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Information and crowding externalities
Robert Clark, Mattias Polborn
2005· article· en· Economic Theory· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reasons and Decisions
Diane Jeske, John Horton, Frederick Stoutland, Jan Narveson, Margaret Gilbert
2013· article· en· Jurisprudence· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Haidoterminus
2017· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Misaligned Agents
2025· preprint· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction
2000· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Verifiability and Effective Persuasion
Noemie Cabau, Ming Li
2023· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Game theory
Ekram Hossain, Dusit Niyato, Han Zhu
2009· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About