MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Alberta Law Review
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

978 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
978 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 20

Labels cover 0 of 978 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 978 of 978 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueaboutunlabeled
The Legal Status of the Joint Venture
Robert Flannigan
2009· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Gross Negligence in Canadian Energy Contracts
Miles Pittman, Jaclyn Hesje, Adam Lamoureux
2013· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Bruce Ziff's Legal History
Eric M. Adams
2023· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Recent Income Tax Developments
Roch Martin
2002· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Some Legal Legends
The Honourable W. G. Morrow
2025· article· Alberta Law Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Restrictive Covenants: When the Honeymoon Ends
Shafik Bhalloo, Alisha Parma
2016· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The District Court of Alberta
The Honourable John N. Decore
2025· article· Alberta Law Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Energy Storage: The Regulatory Landscape in Alberta
David Eeles, Matthew Keen, Alexander Baer, Ryan Taylor
2021· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About