MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

709 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
709 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 15

Labels cover 0 of 709 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 709 of 709 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Bisphenol A and Infant Neonatal Neurobehavior
Lois A. Haighton, Jeffrey W. Card, Barry Lynch, Ashley Roberts
2012· letter· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Dietary Nitrate: Ward et al. Respond
Mary H. Ward, Theo M. de Kok, Patrick Levallois, Jean D. Brender, Gabriel Guliš, James VanDerslice +1 more
2006· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Comparison of Study Controls
Seiichiroh Ohsako, Chiharu Tohyama
2005· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian Hot Weather Health-Response Plan
SC Arya
2002· letter· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Signal-To-Noise Crossover Dose: Sand et al. Respond
Salomon Sand, Christopher J. Portier, Daniel Krewski
2012· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Dioxin-Contaminated Farmed Salmon: Foran et al. Respond
Jeffery A. Foran, David O. Carpenter, M. Coreen Hamilton, Barbara A. Knuth, Steven J. Schwager
2005· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Recycling. A Less Trashy Nova Scotia
Lindsey A. Greene
2001· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Ultrafine Particles: Geiser et al. Respond
Marianne Geiser, Barbara Rothen‐Rutishauser, Nadine Kapp, Peter Gehr, Samuel Schürch, Wolfgang G. Kreyling +4 more
2006· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Asbestos: Showdown in El Dorado
Rebecca Renner
2004· article· es· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Controversial Canadian regs.
Scott Fields
2001· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Beat
Erin E. Dooley
2008· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES: Microscopy Not to Dye For
Tim Lougheed
2010· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Oil Sands Contaminants
Steve E. Hrudey
2011· letter· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
ELF MFs: Straif et al. Respond
Kurt Straíf, Elisabeth Cardis, Paolo Boffetta, Marie‐Claude Rousseau, Jack Siemiatycki
2005· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Beat
Erin E. Dooley
2006· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Agriculture: Farm Chore Checkup
Julia R. Barrett
2004· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About