MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411140822 · doi:10.1021/ehp.6c00019

Associations of Gestational and Childhood Urinary Triclosan Concentrations with Atopic and Allergic Symptoms in Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) Study Participants Ages 1–12 Years

2025· article· en· W4411140822 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah E. Laue, Elvira S. Fleury, Medina S. Jackson-Browne, Antonia M. Calafat, Aimin Chen, Kimberly Yolton, Kim M. Cecil, Nicholas Newman, Jessie P. Buckley, Bruce P. Lanphear, Joseph M. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Perspectives · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
KeywordsTriclosanMedicineUrinary systemEnvironmental healthPediatricsPregnancyGestationGestational ageInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Triclosan, an antimicrobial chemical that was widely used in consumer products, may increase risk of allergic diseases in children, but prospective studies are needed to clarify the association. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the associations of time-varying urinary triclosan concentrations with eczema, allergic rhinitis, and wheeze. METHODS: In the HOME Study, a prospective pregnancy and birth cohort, we quantified urinary triclosan concentrations in mother-child pairs up to ten times between 16 weeks’ gestation and age 12 years. Caregivers reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, and wheeze symptoms biannually until children were aged 6 years and again when they were aged 8 and 12 years. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the covariate-adjusted association of gestational and childhood triclosan concentrations with the risk of reporting eczema, allergic rhinitis, or wheezing symptoms. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-seven mother-child dyads contributed >3,000 visits to the analysis of gestational exposures and >2,600 visits to childhood analyses. Each 2-fold higher childhood triclosan concentration was associated with 1.23 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.46) and 1.12 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.25) times higher risk of reporting eczema and allergic rhinitis, respectively, but not wheezing (RR = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.82, 1.16]). We did not observe modification by child sex. Associations of gestational triclosan with eczema, allergic rhinitis, or wheezing symptoms were null in the full sample. Child sex modified the association of gestational triclosan with allergic rhinitis and wheezing (p-interaction Allergy: 0.02; p-interaction Wheezing:0.10), with 1.09 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.19) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.00) times the risk of allergic rhinitis symptoms among males and females, respectively. CONCLUSION: Childhood urinary triclosan concentrations were associated with caregiver reported eczema and more weakly with allergic rhinitis. Associations of gestational triclosan with allergic outcomes differed by child sex, suggesting heightened susceptibility to triclosan among males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health PerspectivesSame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207