MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian parliamentary review
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,210 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002021
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,210 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 25

Labels cover 3 of 1,210 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,210 of 1,210 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
Financing canadian elections
W. Scott Thurlow
2008· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canada Today: A Democratic Audit
William Cross
2001· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
New Brunswick's Legislative Assembly
Donald Anton Desserud, Stewart Hyson
2012· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
神経病理 1 Glymphatic Systemとは
Sakai Tatsuo
2019· article· ja· Canadian parliamentary review· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Great Fire of 1916 on Parliament Hill
Frank Piekielko
2016· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
診断の進歩 7.悪性中皮腫の診断
岸本卓巳
2007· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Accommodation as a canadian tradition
Pierre Claude Nolin
2008· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Whole exome sequencingでわかること
樋口雄二郎, 高嶋博
2018· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
機能性疾患 2.特発性無汗症
中里良彦
2006· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
小児神経疾患 1.海馬回旋遅滞症
加藤俊徳
2006· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About