MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

807 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
807 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 17

Labels cover 2 of 807 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 807 of 807 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Learning from presupposition
Dominic Alford‐Duguid
2025· article· en· Mind & Language· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
What Could Go Wrong?
Nausica Palazzo, Jeffrey A. Redding
2022· book-chapter· en· Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
3. Objections and Replies
John Turri
2016· book-chapter· en· Open Book Publishers· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Autonomy as Practical Understanding
Reza Hadisi
2024· article· en· Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Two distinct concepts of knowledge
2021· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Bringing Philosophy into Scientific Research
Marley Ottoman
2021· article· en· Berkeley Scientific Journal· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
4. Le savoir selon Guillaume d’Ockham
Claude Panaccio
2016· book-chapter· fr· Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Gerken on epistemic focal bias
Michael Blome‐Tillmann
2023· article· en· Inquiry· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Belief in context
2011· article· en· cIRcle (University of British Columbia)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
:<i>Bias: A Philosophical Study</i>
Endre Begby
2024· article· en· Ethics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Cogito and Moore
David Barnett
2023· article· en· Synthese· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Inquiry and its Norms
Eliran Haziza
2023· dissertation· TSpace· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
A Skeptic's Collaborative Experience
Barry Power
2007· article· en· Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Nyere nordisk retsfilosofi
Henrik Palmer Olsen
2011· article· da· Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Why Do We Believe What We Believe?
Humraaz S. Samra, Sarah Abdulla, Gavin J.B. Elias, Kieran J. Murphy
2018· article· en· Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Thinking We Know More than We Do
Louise Barrett
2020· article· en· Human Ethology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About