MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
New Phytologist
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

972 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
972 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 20

Labels cover 0 of 972 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 972 of 972 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundaboutunlabeled
Plastid genomes hit the big time
David Roy Smith
2018· letter· en· New Phytologist· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
Questions about floral (dis)integration
Lawrence D. Harder
2009· article· en· New Phytologist· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
More complexity in the mycorrhizal world
Marc‐André Selosse, Sébastien Duplessis
2006· article· en· New Phytologist· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Mycorrhiza for all: an under‐earth revolution
Laura B. Martínez‐García, Kevin Garcia, Edith C. Hammer, Alice Vayssières
2013· article· en· New Phytologist· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nonsymbiotic legumes are more invasive, but only if polyploid
Zoe A. Parshuram, Tia L. Harrison, Anna K. Simonsen, John R. Stinchcombe, Megan E. Frederickson
2022· article· en· New Phytologist· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About