MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

This cohort has 4,299,418 works, more than the 100,000-row export cap: the file will contain the first 100,000 ordered by OpenAlex id, and says so in its last line. Narrow the cohort, page the API, or rebuild the frame from the repository for the rest. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,299,418 results · 0 filters active
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,299,418 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1,775 of 85,989

Labels cover 11,048 of 4,299,418 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,299,418 of 4,299,418 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
SCAI expert consensus statement: Evaluation, management, and special considerations of cardio‐oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (Endorsed by the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologıa Intervencionista)
Cezar Iliescu, Cindy L. Grines, Joerg Herrmann, Eric H. Yang, Mehmet Çilingiroğlu, Konstantinos Charitakis +4 more
2015· article· en· Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
185
citations
affunlabeled
The STAMPede approach to thread-level speculation
J. Gregory Steffan, Christopher B. Colohan, Antonia Zhai, Todd C. Mowry
2005· article· en· ACM Transactions on Computer Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
185
citations
affunlabeled
Genomics of hybrid poplar (<i>Populus trichocarpa</i>×<i> deltoides</i>) interacting with forest tent caterpillars (<i>Malacosoma disstria</i>): normalized and full‐length cDNA libraries, expressed sequence tags, and a cDNA microarray for the study of insect‐induced defences in poplar
Steven Ralph, Claire Oddy, Dawn Cooper, Hesther Yueh, Sharon Jancsik, Natalia Kolosova +25 more
2006· article· en· Molecular Ecology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
185
citations
afffundunlabeled
A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines
Paul W. Wales, Nancy C. Allen, Patricia Worthington, Donald E. George, Charlene Compher
2014· review· en· Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
185
citations
affunlabeled
The Forgotten Serine
George Liapakis, Juan Antonio Ballesteros‐Cánovas, Stavros Papachristou, Wai Chi Chan, Xun Chen, Jonathan A. Javitch
2000· article· en· Journal of Biological Chemistry· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
185
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About