MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,126 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,126 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 18 of 23

Labels cover 0 of 1,126 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,126 of 1,126 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Loutsenko and Roubtsov Reply:
Igor Loutsenko, D. Roubtsov
2000· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Quantum Aspects of Materials II
Rainer Dick
2011· book-chapter· en· Graduate texts in physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Strong-field physics: general discussion
Kyle Acheson, Felix Allum, Rituparna Das, Gopal Dixit, Huan V. Doan, Elke Faßhauer +19 more
2021· article· en· Faraday Discussions· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Mott scattering in strong laser fields revisited
B. Manaut, Y. Attaourti, S. Taj, S. Elhandi
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Laser cooling of atoms
R. A. Dunlap
2023· book-chapter· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Bose-Einsten condensation
Julia Petrović
2019· dissertation· hr· PHYRI Repository· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
[no title]
2021· other· fr· Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Playing a quantum game with a qutrit
Urbasi Sinha, Piotr Kolenderski, Youning Li, Matthew Volpini, Adán Cabello, Raymond Laflamme +1 more
2014· article· en· AIP conference proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Interactions propel a magnetic dance
Lindsay J. LeBlanc
2017· letter· en· Nature· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About