MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132069806

Bose-Einsten condensation

2019· dissertation· hr· W7132069806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Petrović

Bibliographic record

VenuePHYRI Repository · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensationLeft main bronchusSchool nurse
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bose - Einsteinova kondenzacija je specifična vrsta faznog prijelaza preko koje je omogućeno proučavanje kvantnih efekata na makroskopskoj razini. Takav prijelaz karakterizira pad velikog broja bozona u osnovno stanje i opserviranje velikog vala materije. Teorija pretpostavljena od strane Alberta Einsteina dvadesetih godina 20. stoljeća daje statističku pozadinu o ponašanju plina bozona nakon sto se temperatura sustava smanji ispod kritične temperature. Da bi se mogla razviti intuitivna percepcija o prelasku iz običnog Boseovog plina u Bose - Einsteinov kondenzat, kreće se od uvođenja de Broglieve valne duljine te objašnjava kako ona postaje sve veća snižavanjem temperature sustava. Potom kvantno - statistički koncept daje konkretan izračun i objašnjenje kritične temperature. Predstavlja se pojednostavljeni teorijski model za Bose - Einsteinov kondenzat preko Gross - Pitaevskii jednadžbe, uz pobliže objašnjenje kroz raspršenje hladnih atoma i definiranje duljine raspršenja za nisko temperaturni sustav bozona. Nakon teorijskog objašnjenja daje se povijesni pregled teorijskih i eksperimentalnih radova koji su prethodili realizaciji Bose - Einsteinove kondenzacije, a usko su povezani s njom. Na kraju su opisane tehnike hlađenja sustava bozona te rezultati prvog postizanja kondenzata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePHYRI RepositorySame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207