MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,873 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,873 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 18 of 78

Labels cover 1 of 3,873 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,873 of 3,873 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The wind of W Hydrae as seen by<i>Herschel</i>
T. Khouri, A. de Koter, L. Decin, L. B. F. M. Waters, R. Lombaert, P. Royer +22 more
2013· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Survey of Surveys
M. Tsantaki, E. Pancino, P. M. Marrese, S. Marinoni, M. Rainer, N. Sanna +5 more
2021· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
afffundunlabeled
Chemical gradients in the Milky Way from the RAVE data
C. Boeche, A. Siebert, T. Piffl, A. Just, M. Steinmetz, E. K. Grebel +16 more
2014· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
affunlabeled
The everchanging pulsating white dwarf GD358
S. O. Kepler, R. E. Nather, D. E. Winget, A. Nitta, S. J. Kleinman, Τ. S. Metcalfe +39 more
2003· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Eclipsing Am binary systems in the SuperWASP survey
B. Smalley, J. Southworth, O. I. Pintado, M. Gillon, Daniel L. Holdsworth, D. R. Anderson +15 more
2014· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
afffundunlabeled
CHANG-ES
2020· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
66
citations
afffundunlabeled
DREAM
V. Bourrier, O. Attia, M. Mallonn, ACF Marret, M. Lendl, P.-C. König +25 more
2023· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
66
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The<i>XMM-Newton</i>serendipitous survey
I. Traulsen, A. Schwope, G. Lamer, J. Ballet, F. J. Carrera, M. T. Ceballos +9 more
2020· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
Water in star-forming regions with<i>Herschel</i>(WISH)
J. C. Mottram, L. E. Kristensen, E. F. van Dishoeck, S. Bruderer, I. San José-García, A. Karska +14 more
2014· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Radio spectrum and distance of the SNR HB9
D. A. Leahy, W. W. Tian
2006· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
The HerMES SPIRE submillimeter local luminosity function
M. Vaccari, L. Marchetti, A. Franceschini, B. Altieri, A. Amblard, V. Arumugam +73 more
2010· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
The Vega debris disc: A view from<i>Herschel</i>
B. Sibthorpe, B. Vandenbussche, J. S. Greaves, E. Pantin, G. Olofsson, B. Acke +34 more
2010· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Planck</i>intermediate results
N. Aghanim, M. I. R. Alves, D. Arzoumanian, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini +161 more
2016· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Tarantula Massive Binary Monitoring
L. Mahy, H. Sana, M. Abdul-Masih, L. A. Almeida, N. Langer, T. Shenar +14 more
2019· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Planck</i>intermediate results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, F. Argüeso, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio‐Barandela +177 more
2012· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affunlabeled
KiDS-1000: Cosmic shear with enhanced redshift calibration
Jan Luca van den Busch, A. H. Wright, H. Hildebrandt, Maciej Bilicki, Marika Asgari, Shahab Joudaki +5 more
2022· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Planck </i>intermediate results
N. Aghanim, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday +149 more
2016· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
fundno affunlabeled
In pursuit of giants
D. Donevski, Andrea Lapi, K. Małek, Daizhong Liu, Carlos Gómez-Guijarro, Romeel Davé +8 more
2020· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Flares in open clusters with K2
Ekaterina Ilin, Sarah J. Schmidt, James R. A. Davenport, K. G. Strassmeier
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affunlabeled
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
C. P. Haines, A. Iovino, J. Krywult, L. Guzzo, I. Davidzon, M. Bolzonella +34 more
2017· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About