Theoretical electron affinities of PAHs and electronic absorption spectra of their mono-anions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present theoretical electron affinities, calculated as total energy differences, for a large sample of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), ranging in size from azulene (C 10 H 8 ) to dicoronylene (C 48 H 20 ). For 20 out of 22 molecules under study we obtained electron affinity values in the range 0.4-2.0 eV, showing them to be able to accept an additional electron in their LUMO orbital. For the mono-anions we computed the absolute photo-absorption cross-sections up to the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) using an implementation in real time and real space of the Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT), an approach which has already been proven to yield accurate results for neutral and cationic PAHs. Comparison with available experimental data hints that this is the case for mono-anions as well. We find that PAH anions, like their parent molecules and the corresponding cations, display strong * electronic transitions in the UV. The present results provide a quantitative foundation to estimate the fraction of specific PAHs which can be singly negatively charged in various interstellar environments, to simulate their photophysics in detail and to evaluate their contribution to the interstellar extinction curve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it