MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 19 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Weyl connections and their role in holography
Luca Ciambelli, Robert G. Leigh
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
Linearized gravity about a brane
Hael Collins, Bob Holdom
2000· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
afffundunlabeled
A conformal block Farey tail
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
afffundunlabeled
Asymptotic four point functions
Benjamin Basso, Frank Coronado, Shota Komatsu, Ho Tat Lam, Pedro Vieira, De-liang Zhong
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmic string loops as the seeds of super-massive black holes
Sebastian F. Bramberger, Robert Brandenberger, Paul Jreidini, Jerome Quintin
2015· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Branonium
C. P. Burgess, Patrick Martineau, Fernando Quevedo, Raúl Rabadán
2003· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Navigator function for the conformal bootstrap
Marten Reehorst
2021· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Random walks and the Hagedorn transition
Martı́n Kruczenski, Albion Lawrence
2006· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Non-Abelian phenomena on D-branes
2003· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic complexity in dSd+1
Eivind Jørstad, Robert C. Myers, Shan-Ming Ruan
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Toric geometry and the dual of ℐ-extremization
Jerome P. Gauntlett, Dario Martelli, James Sparks
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Topology of future infinity in dS/CFT
Shamik Banerjee, Alexandre Belin, Simeon Hellerman, Arnaud Lepage-Jutier, Alexander Maloney, Đorđe Radičević +1 more
2013· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
From p-branes to fluxbranes and back
2001· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Notes on flat-space limit of AdS/CFT
Yue-Zhou Li
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Nonlinear parent action and dual gravity
Nicolas Boulanger, Olaf Hohm
2008· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About