On the global structure of deformed Yang-Mills theory and QCD(adj) on ℝ 3 × S 1 $$ {\mathrm{\mathbb{R}}}^3\times {\mathbb{S}}^1 $$
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spatial compactification on $$ {\mathrm{\mathbb{R}}}^3\times {\mathbb{S}}_L^1 $$ at small $$ {\mathbb{S}}^1 $$ -size L often leads to a calculable vacuum structure, where various “topological molecules” are responsible for confinement and the realization of the center and discrete chiral symmetries. Within this semiclassically calculable framework, we study how distinct theories with the same $$ \mathrm{S}\mathrm{U}\left({N}_c\right)/{\mathrm{\mathbb{Z}}}_k $$ gauge group (labeled by “discrete θ-angles”) arise upon gauging of appropriate $$ {\mathrm{\mathbb{Z}}}_k $$ subgroups of the one-form global center symmetry of an SU(N c ) gauge theory. We determine the possible $$ {\mathrm{\mathbb{Z}}}_k $$ actions on the local electric and magnetic effective degrees of freedom, find the ground states, and use domain walls and confining strings to give a physical picture of the vacuum structure of the different $$ \mathrm{S}\mathrm{U}\left({N}_c\right)/{\mathrm{\mathbb{Z}}}_k $$ theories. Some of our results reproduce ones from earlier supersymmetric studies, but most are new and do not invoke supersymmetry. We also study a further finite-temperature compactification to $$ {\mathrm{\mathbb{R}}}^2\times {\mathbb{S}}_{\beta}^1\times {\mathbb{S}}_L^1 $$ . We argue that, in deformed Yang-Mills theory, the effective theory near the deconfinement temperature β c ≫ L exhibits an emergent Kramers-Wannier duality and that it exchanges high- and low-temperature theories with different global structure, sharing features with both the Ising model and S-duality in $$ \mathcal{N}=4 $$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".