MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

389 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
389 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 8

Labels cover 0 of 389 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 389 of 389 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Three Series for the Generalized Golden Mean
Kevin G. Hare, Helmut Prodinger, Jeffrey Shallit
2014· article· en· ˜The œFibonacci quarterly· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
How Does an Electron Tell the Time?
G. N. Ord, Robert B. Mann
2011· article· en· International Journal of Theoretical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundunlabeled
The inertia tensor of a magic cube
Adam Rogers, P. D. Loly
2004· article· en· American Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Generalized k-Fibonacci and k-Lucas Numbers.
Kemal Uslu, Necati Taşkara, Halil Köse
2011· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
General conditional recurrences
Daniel Panario, Murat Şahin, Qiang Wang, William A. Webb
2014· article· en· Applied Mathematics and Computation· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Lucas Sequences
Christian Ballot, Hugh C. Williams
2023· book· en· CMS/CAIMS books in mathematics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Fibonacci Meets Hofstadter
Frank Ruskey
2011· article· en· ˜The œFibonacci quarterly· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Some primality tests that eluded Lucas
Eric L. F. Roettger, Hywel C Williams, R. Kent Guy
2015· article· en· Designs Codes and Cryptography· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Golden Ratio and Hydrodynamics
Boris Khesin, Hanchun Wang
2021· article· en· The Mathematical Intelligencer· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Tribonacci and Tribonacci-Lucas Hybrinomials
Yasemin Taşyurdu, Yunis Emre Polat
2021· article· en· Journal of Mathematics Research· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
On The Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers.
Gwang Yeon Lee, Mustafa Aşçı
2017· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Bi-Periodic Incomplete Lucas Sequences.
Elif Tan, Ali Bülent Ekin
2015· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Changhee-Genocchi Numbers And Their Applications.
Hong-Kyung Pak, Joohee Jeong, Dong-Jin Kang, Seog-Hoon Rim
2018· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Fibonacci Polynomials in Rings.
Yasemin Taşyurdu, Ömür Deveci
2017· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About