MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Analytical chemistry methods development
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,254 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,254 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 26

Labels cover 3 of 1,254 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,254 of 1,254 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Biological Applications
Zahra El-Schich, Yuecheng Zhang, Marek Feith, Sarah Beyer, Louise Sternbæk, Lars Ohlsson +2 more
2020· review· en· BioTechniques· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
133
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Automation of solid‐phase microextraction
John W. O’Reilly, Qing Wang, Lucie Šetková, Joseph P. Hutchinson, Yong Chen, Heather Lord +2 more
2005· article· en· Journal of Separation Science· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
121
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Development and application of needle trap devices
In‐Yong Eom, Anca-Maria Tugulea, Janusz Pawliszyn
2008· article· en· Journal of Chromatography A· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
113
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
In vivo sampling with solid phase microextraction
Florin Marcel Musteata, Janusz Pawliszyn
2006· review· en· Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
101
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About