MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

871 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
871 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 18

Labels cover 0 of 871 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 871 of 871 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundaboutno affunlabeled
High School Choices and the Gender Gap in STEM
David Card, A. Abigail Payne
2017· preprint· en· National Bureau of Economic Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affunlabeled
Occupational Engagement Scale–Student
Daniel W. Cox, Thomas S. Krieshok, Abby L. Bjornsen, Bruno D. Zumbo
2014· article· en· Journal of Career Assessment· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
37
citations
affunlabeled
THE BENEFITS OF MENTORING FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS
Jean E. Wallace, Valerie A. Haines
2004· article· en· Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Engineering Education through the Latina Lens
Elsa Villa, Luciene Wandermurem, Elaine Hampton, Alberto Esquinca
2016· article· en· Journal of Education and Learning· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About