MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

830 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
830 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 17

Labels cover 0 of 830 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 830 of 830 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Distraction as a determinant of processing speed
Cindy Lustig, Lynn Hasher, Simon T. Tonev
2006· article· en· Psychonomic Bulletin & Review· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
127
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mechanisms underlying training-induced cognitive change
Claudia C. von Bastian, Sylvie Belleville, Robert Udale, Alice Reinhartz, Mehdi Essounni, Tilo Strobach
2022· article· en· Nature Reviews Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
122
citations
affunlabeled
Stability of sociometric categories
Antonius H. N. Cillessen, William M. Bukowski, Gerbert J. T. Haselager
2000· review· en· New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
114
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Genetics and genomics of depression
Pavel Hamet, Johanne Tremblay
2005· review· en· Metabolism· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
111
citations
affunlabeled
Cognitive Control in Children
Daniel N. Bub, Michael E. J. Masson, Christopher E. Lalonde
2006· article· en· Psychological Science· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
107
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition
Lawrence G. Weiss, Victoria Locke, Tianshu Pan, Jossette G. Harris, Donald H. Saklofske, Aurelio Prifitera
2019· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
93
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
The Quebec Newborn Twin Study Into Adolescence: 15 Years Later
Michel Boivin, Mara Brendgen, Ginette Dionne, Lise Dubois, Daniel Pérusse, Philippe Robaey +2 more
2012· review· en· Twin Research and Human Genetics· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
80
citations
affunlabeled
The Evolution of Thought
Anne E. Russon, David R. Begun, Richard W. Byrne, Sue Taylor Parker, Joanna Blake, Carol E. MacLeod +10 more
2004· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
76
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About