MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

730 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
730 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 15

Labels cover 10 of 730 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 730 of 730 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Scientist's birthright
Dennis Danielson
2001· article· en· Nature· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Evaluation of the impact of interdisciplinarity in cancer care
Dominique Tremblay, Danièle Roberge, Linda Cazale, Nassera Touati, Elizabeth Maunsell, Jean Latreille +1 more
2011· article· en· BMC Health Services Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Need for a Transdisciplinary, Global Health Framework
Martin Picard, Catherine M. Sabiston, Judyann K. McNamara
2011· article· en· The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Une nouvelle logique de l’interdisciplinarité
Anne-Françoise Schmid, Muriel Mambrini-Doudet, Armand Hatchuel
2011· article· fr· Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Philosophy in Reality
Joseph E. Brenner, Abir U. Igamberdiev
2020· book· en· Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Global Knowledge Society
Nina V. Fedoroff
2012· editorial· en· Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fostering Learning and Reciprocity in Interdisciplinary Research
Liza Lorenzetti, Michele Jacobsen, Diane Lorenzetti, Lorelli Nowell, Helen Pethrick, Tracey Clancy +2 more
2022· article· en· Small Group Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
21
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Interdisciplinarity of Economics
Alexandre Truc, O. Gallet de Santerre, Yves Gingras, François Claveau
2020· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About