MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,343 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,343 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 67

Labels cover 10 of 3,343 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,343 of 3,343 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, EMPLOYMENT, AND DIVORCE*
Audra J. Bowlus, Shannon Seitz
2006· article· en· International Economic Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
187
citations
affunlabeled
HIV/AIDS and Intimate Partner Violence
Andrea C. Gielen, Reem M. Ghandour, Jessica G. Burke, Patricia Mahoney, Karen A. McDonnell, Patricia O’Campo
2007· review· en· Trauma Violence & Abuse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
184
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Chronic Pain in Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
Judith Wuest, Marilyn Merritt‐Gray, Marilyn Ford‐Gilboe, Barbara Lent, Colleen Varcoe, Jacquelyn C. Campbell
2008· article· en· Journal of Pain· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
182
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Who Is Most at Risk for Intimate Partner Violence?
Sarah Romans, Tonia Forte, Marsha M. Cohen, Janice Du Mont, Ilene Hyman
2007· article· en· Journal of Interpersonal Violence· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
181
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Losing Control
Holly Johnson, Tina Hotton
2003· article· en· Homicide Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
177
citations
affunlabeled
Love as a Battlefield
Colleen J. Allison, Kim Bartholomew, Ofra Mayseless, Donald G. Dutton
2007· article· en· Journal of Family Issues· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
160
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Problem Gambling and Intimate Partner Violence
Lorne Korman, Jane Collins, Don Dutton, Bramilee Dhayananthan, Nina Littman-Sharp, Wayne Skinner
2007· article· en· Journal of Gambling Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
150
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About