MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,276 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,276 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 26

Labels cover 2 of 1,276 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,276 of 1,276 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Synaesthetic Photisms Influence Visual Perception
Daniel Smilek, Mike J. Dixon, Cera Cudahy, Philip M. Merikle
2001· article· en· Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
178
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Tactile “capture” of audition
Anne Caclin, Salvador Soto‐Faraco, Alan Kingstone, Charles Spence
2002· article· en· Perception & Psychophysics· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
161
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Audiovisual prior entry
Massimiliano Zampini, David I. Shore, Charles Spence
2005· article· en· Neuroscience Letters· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
139
citations
affunlabeled
Synesthetic Color Experiences Influence Memory
Daniel Smilek, Mike J. Dixon, Cera Cudahy, Philip M. Merikle
2002· article· en· Psychological Science· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
afffundunlabeled
Salient Sounds Activate Human Visual Cortex Automatically
John J. McDonald, Viola S. Störmer, Antı́gona Martı́nez, Wenfeng Feng, Steven A. Hillyard
2013· article· en· Journal of Neuroscience· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
119
citations
afffundunlabeled
Multisensory Integration and Child Neurodevelopment
Emmanuelle Dionne-Dostie, Natacha Paquette, Maryse Lassonde, Anne Gallagher
2015· review· en· Brain Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
117
citations
afffundunlabeled
Revisiting the innate preference for consonance.
Judy Plantinga, Sandra E. Trehub
2013· article· en· Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
113
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About