MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

718 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
718 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 15

Labels cover 1 of 718 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 718 of 718 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Simultaneous 222Rn and 220Rn measurements in Winnipeg, Canada
J. Chen, Eveline Schroth, Esther MacKinlay, I. A.J. Fife, Atsuyuki Sorimachi, Shinji Tokonami
2009· article· en· Radiation Protection Dosimetry· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
37
citations
afffundunlabeled
Case-control study of radon and lung cancer in New Jersey
Homer Wilcox, Mustafa Al‐Zoughool, M J Garner, Hong Jiang, Judith B. Klotz, Daniel Krewski +4 more
2007· article· en· Radiation Protection Dosimetry· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
36
citations
affvenueaboutno abstractunlabeled
Geographic variation in radon and associated lung cancer risk in Canada
Perry Hystad, Michael Bräuer, Paul A. Demers, Kenneth C. Johnson, Eleanor Setton, Alejandro Cervantes-Larios +4 more
2014· article· en· Canadian Journal of Public Health· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
fundno affunlabeled
RADON IN US WORKPLACES: A REVIEW
Robert D. Daniels, Mary K. Schubauer‐Berigan
2017· review· en· Radiation Protection Dosimetry· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
World Health Organization’s International Radon Project
Jan M. Zielinski, Zhanat Carr, Daniel Krewski, Michael H. Repacholi
2006· article· en· Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About