MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

105 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
105 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 105 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 105 of 105 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
In Search of Matthew Effects in Reading
Athanassios Protopapas, Rauno Parrila, Panagiotis G. Simos
2014· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Beyond Transition
Paul J. Gerber, Lynda Price, Robert Mulligan, Isabel Shessel
2004· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
Parents and Youth With Learning Disabilities
Tali Heiman, Lana C. Zinck, Nancy L. Heath
2008· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
affunlabeled
Prediction and Stability of Mathematics Skill and Difficulty
Rebecca Martin, Paul T. Cirino, Marcia A. Barnes, Linda Ewing‐Cobbs, Lynn S. Fuchs, Karla K. Stuebing +1 more
2012· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
School Evolution
Virginia W. Berninger, Alnita Dunn, Shin-Ju Lin, Shirley Shimada
2004· review· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
RAN and Double-Deficit Theory
Virginia Cronin
2011· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affunlabeled
Dyslexia and Dysgraphia
David S. Mather
2003· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
Perceptions of Academic Performance
Nancy L. Heath, Elizabeth Roberts, Jessica R. Toste
2011· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Putative Risk Factors in Developmental Dyslexia
Sara Mascheretti, Cecilia Marino, Daniela Simone, Ermanno Quadrelli, Valentina Riva, Maria Rosaria Cellino +3 more
2013· article· en· Journal of Learning Disabilities· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About