MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Particles as Wilson lines of the gravitational field
Laurent Freidel, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, Artem Starodubtsev
2006· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Fricke S-duality in CHL models
Daniel Persson, Roberto Volpato
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
The giant graviton expansion
Davide Gaiotto, Ji Hoon Lee
2024· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
afffundunlabeled
Analyzing the squeezed state generated by a twist deformation
Benjamin A. Burrington, Samir D. Mathur, Amanda W. Peet, Ida G. Zadeh
2015· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bethe ansätze for GKP strings
Benjamin Basso, Adam Rej
2013· article· de· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Entropy of 4D black holes and the enhançon
Neil R. Constable
2001· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Little string theory from a double-scaled matrix model
Henry Ling, Ali Reza Mohazab, Hsien-Hang Shieh, Greg van Anders, Mark Van Raamsdonk
2006· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmology on a 3-brane
2000· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Are quantization rules for horizon areas universal?
Valerio Faraoni, Andres F. Zambrano Moreno
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rotating black holes in brane worlds
Valeri P. Frolov, D. V. Fursaev, Dejan Stojković
2004· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Test of gauge-Yukawa unification
Ilia Gogoladze, Yukihiro Mimura, S. Nandi, Kazuhiro Tobe
2003· article· en· Physics Letters B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Superstars and Giant Gravitons in M-theory
2002· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
Klebanov-Strassler black hole
Alex Buchel
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Creating the universe from brane-antibrane annihilation
Neil Barnaby, James M. Cline
2004· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions
M. Jimena Rodríguez, Luca Santoni, Adam R. Solomon, Luis Fernando Temoche
2023· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Squashed black holes in Gödel universes
Cristian Stelea, Kristin Schleich, Donald Witt
2008· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
<i>D</i>-branes as a bubbling Calabi-Yau
Jaume Gomis, Takuya Okuda
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Model building with gauge-Yukawa unification
Ilia Gogoladze, Yukihiro Mimura, S. Nandi
2004· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic photon production in heavy ion collisions
Ioannis Iatrakis, Elias Kiritsis, Chun Shen, Di-Lun Yang
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
Accelerating Black Holes
2017· article· en· Journal of Physics Conference Series· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About