MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020467052 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.026015

Query complexity and cutoff dependence of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>CFT</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> ground state

2021· article· lv· W3020467052 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bowen Chen, Bartłomiej Czech, Zi-zhi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaSouth China Normal UniversityKavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa BarbaraOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationYukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto UniversityTsinghua UniversitySeoul National UniversityGovernment of Canada
KeywordsCutoffCurvaturePhysicsOperator (biology)Mathematical physicsAlgorithmMathematicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the vacuum of a two-dimensional conformal field theory as a network of Wilson lines in $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ Chern-Simons theory, which is conventionally used to study gravity in three-dimensional anti--de Sitter space. The position and shape of the network encode the cutoff scale at which the ground state density operator is defined. In the framework of query complexity, a general argument relates the ``density of complexity'' of the network to the extrinsic curvature of the cutoff surface in ${\mathrm{AdS}}_{3}$, which accords with the holographic $\mathrm{complexity}=\text{volume proposal}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207