MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,399 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,399 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 28

Labels cover 3 of 1,399 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,399 of 1,399 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Fatigue Risk Management Program – A Fit for Purpose Approach
Noel Ryan, Huma Abassi
2012· article· en· International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Contributors
2011· article· en· INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Table of Contents
2020· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
ESTIMATING LNG SPREADING ON WATER1
Merv Fingas, William J. Lehr, Debra Simecek-Beatty
2005· article· en· International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A Graph-Attention Solution for Breakdown Prediction (GASBP)
Raoof Doorshi, Reza Khoshkangini, Enayat Rajabi, Amin Sahba, Ramin Sahba
2024· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in networks and systems· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Risk Management for Rail Safety: Post Lac Megantic
Vijay Raghunathan, Ron Mitchell, Robin Pitblado, Hong Mei Wu
2016· article· en· Volume 14: Emerging Technologies; Materials: Genetics to Structures; Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Expert system for fire and reactivity MSDS text
Brenda Prine, Alex Kalos, J.B. Powers, R. Kalnins
2006· article· en· Process Safety Progress· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Conclusions
Alyson Kettles, Phil Woods
2009· other· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
New Sour Gas Requirements for Alberta
G. J. DeSorcy
2001· article· en· Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
SSHOC D1.2 Quality Assurance & Risk Assessment Plan
Martina Drascic, Ivana Ilijašić Veršić, Carsten Thiel, Daan Broeder, Gianmaria Bottoni, Marieke Willems +5 more
2019· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
RISK MANAGEMENT IN AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
Dolores Gracja Piwek
2020· article· en· Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Sztuki Wojennej· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
10.51847/Qg52d0LmuK
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Margin of Safety (MOS)
Gerald R. Stephenson, Ian G. Ferris, Patrick T. Holland, Monica Nordberg
2016· dataset· en· IUPAC Standards Online· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Notes on Society History
Rex Gordon
2015· article· en· Journal of System Safety· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About