MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,504 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,504 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 27 of 51

Labels cover 1 of 2,504 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,504 of 2,504 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Single photons on demand
Barry C. Sanders, Jelena Vučković, Philippe Grangier
2005· article· en· Europhysics news· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum discord in quantum computation
Aharon Brodutch, Alexei Gilchrist, Daniel R. Terno, Christopher J. Wood
2016· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundunlabeled
Gaussian ancillary bombardment
Daniel Grimmer, Eric G. Brown, Achim Kempf, Robert B. Mann, Eduardo Martín-Martínez
2018· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Units of rotational information
2017· article· en· Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Boundary of the set of separable states
2015· article· en· Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The tangled state of quantum hypothesis testing
Mario Berta, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Gilad Gour, Ludovico Lami, Martin B. Plenio, Bartosz Regula +1 more
2023· article· en· Nature Physics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Qubit readout enabled by qubit cloaking
Manuel H. Muñoz-Arias, Cristóbal Lledó, Alexandre Blais
2023· article· en· Physical Review Applied· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Some geometric interpretations of quantum fidelity
Jin Li, Rajesh Pereira, Sarah Plosker
2015· article· en· Linear Algebra and its Applications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About