MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,207 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,207 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 28 of 45

Labels cover 3 of 2,207 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,207 of 2,207 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Using LiDAR Data for Measuring Transit Stop Coverage
Sajad Shiravi, Ming Zhong, Faranak Hosseini
2014· article· en· Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
URBAN EXPANSION MODELING APPROACH BASED ON MULTI-AGENT SYSTEM AND CELLULAR AUTOMATA
Yuqin Zeng, Mengyao Yu, Songnian Li
2018· article· en· ˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Visual Comparison of Moving-Window Kriging Models
Urška Demšar, Paul Harris
2011· article· en· Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Applying complementarity in ecological restoration
Mink Ryan Verschoor, Yann Hautier, George A. Kowalchuk, Ralph J. M. Temmink, Marijke van Kuijk, Emma Ladouceur +2 more
2025· review· en· Trends in Ecology & Evolution· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
La dynamique sociale des quartiers urbains
Paul Villeneuve, Mathieu Pelletier, Marius Thériault
2009· article· fr· Espace populations sociétés· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About